격이 다른 오디오북 생활을 경험해보세요!
논픽션
Is it ever legitimate to redraw electoral districts on the basis of race? In its long struggle with this question, the U.S. Supreme Court has treated race-conscious redistricting either as a requirement of political fairness or as an exercise in corrosive racial quotas. Cutting through these contradictory positions, Keith Bybee examines the theoretical foundations of the Court's decisions and the ideological controversy those decisions have engendered. He uncovers erroneous assumptions about political identity on both sides of the debate and formulates new terms on which minority representation can be pursued.
As Bybee shows, the Court has for the last twenty years encouraged a division between individualist and group concepts of political identity. He demonstrates convincingly that both individualist and group proponents share the misguided notion that political identity is formed prior to and apart from politics itself. According to Bybee, this "mistaken identity" should be abandoned for a more flexible, politically informed understanding of who the "people" really are. Thus, a misdirected debate will be replaced by a more considered discussion in which the people can speak for themselves, even as the Court speaks on their behalf. Engaged in the politics of minority representation, the Court will be able to help citizens articulate and achieve more fruitful forms of political community.
© 2002 Princeton University Press (전자책 ): 9781400822775
출시일
전자책 : 2002년 7월 1일
국내 유일 해리포터 시리즈 오디오북
5만권이상의 영어/한국어 오디오북
키즈 모드(어린이 안전 환경)
월정액 무제한 청취
언제든 취소 및 해지 가능
오프라인 액세스를 위한 도서 다운로드
친구 또는 가족과 함께 오디오북을 즐기고 싶은 분들을 위해
2-3 계정
무제한 액세스
2-3 계정
무제한 청취
언제든 해지하실 수 있어요
2 계정
17900 원 /월한국어
대한민국