The right to dissent is fair and well but public spaces cannot be occupied indefinitely for demonstrations and in such cases the administration ought to take action — that's was the Supreme Court's verdict on Shaheen Bagh style protests.

But what does that mean for our right to protest?

The Shaheen Bagh sit-in protest against the Citizenship Amendment Bill that was led by women began in December and carried on for over 100 days well upto the start of the lockdown mandated by the coronavirus pandemic.

While it gained momentum in the capital, petitions were filed in the Supreme Court seeking to remove the protesters alleging that their protest was hindering movement of traffic and affecting the right to free movement. And it is during the hearing of one such petition that the SC observed that there needs to be a balance between the right to protest and right to movement.

Although the SC verdict doesn't go against the protesters, it says that going forward such demonstrations of dissent have to be held in designated spaces. Legal experts are of the opinion that it not only violates international laws, but also stands scrutiny under Indian law. Does this verdict impede the right to assemble? Does it hold the right to movement over the right to protest? Tune in to The Big Story!

References:

SC’s Protest Verdict Goes Against Judgment It Relied on: Experts

What Does SC’s Shaheen Bagh Verdict Mean for Our Right to Protest?

Why Shaheen Bagh Verdict Threatens Rights & Favours Restrictions

Protests Can’t Occupy Public Spaces, Roads Like Shaheen Bagh: SC

Delhi Police Blocked Roads, Not us: Shaheen Bagh Protesters to SC

Producer and Host: Shorbori Purkayastha Interviews: Vakasha Sachdev

Editor: Shelly Walia

Music: Big Bang Fuzz

Listen to The Big Story podcast on:

Apple: https://apple.co/2AYdLIl

Saavn: http://bit.ly/2oix78C

Google Podcasts: http://bit.ly/2ntMV7S

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2IyLAUQ

Deezer: http://bit.ly/2Vrf5Ng

Julkaisupäivä

Äänikirja: 9. lokakuuta 2020